Urban Dynamics in the Age of Cities
Debating Development 2015
Urban Dynamics in the Age of Cities
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b1a5/4b1a5b5ca5adde1c8a363b291067922c5a63afce" alt=""
Monday 19 October - Smart cities from scratch: a wise idea?
Ayona Datta (University of Leeds)
Eric Osiakwan (Angel Investor and Tech Entrepreneur, Ghana)
Moderator: Stijn Oosterlynck (University of Antwerp)
In recent years, the idea of “smart” cities has been identified as a key strategy for sustainable urban growth. The concept lends itself to two distinct but related definitions: a smart city can refer to an urban environment in which real-time technologies are embedded into a city’s infrastructure to monitor and regulate the environment, or, it can refer to the catalytic effect of information and communication technologies (ICT) in jumpstarting a knowledge economy. In this debate we focus on the latter definition, and look at how entire regions are being re-designed—or even planned from scratch!—to accommodate ICT industries. Examples of new cities and technology parks abound, for example, Gurgaon (India), Songdo (South Korea), and Cyberjaya (Malaysia). Proponents argue that smart cities leverage technology, innovation and entrepreneurship for development, and that they offer countries the opportunity to “leapfrog” into a high-tech economy. But others say that smart cities are just utopian visions offering few real benefits for local people, many of whom are displaced from their homes and livelihoods to make way for high-rise buildings and office parks. Do smart cities facilitate development, and if so, what kind? Will they usher in equitable development for nations as a whole, or simply create enclave economies that benefit multinational firms the most? Who will be the winners in our smart new world?
https://ayonadatta.wordpress.com
twitter.com/AyonaDatta
Monday 26 October - Building resilient cities: what role for local food production and consumption?
Marielle Dubbeling (RUAF Foundation – Resource Centers on Urban Agriculture and Food security)
Michael Winter (University of Exeter)
Moderator: Erik Mathijs (KU Leuven)
Presentation Dubbeling
Over the last couple of decades, urban agriculture has been booming and micro-urban farms have burgeoned within and around cities of the world. While in the global South, urban agriculture has for a long time contributed to the food security of poor urban dwellers, in the global North, this development has been associated with the local food movement which has emphasized the environmental impacts of global agro-food systems and has advocated for local food systems as a solution to reduce the problem of food miles. In this way, there is now a widespread assumption that producing and consuming local can improve, not only ecological sustainability, food security and nutrition, but also food quality and freshness as well as social justice. However, studies in agro-food research have increasingly challenged the idea that the local is inherently better showing that the scale actually does not matter as local-scale systems might result in the same undesirable outcomes than globalized systems of food provision. Who will benefit from localization? May local food systems in the North hurt the poor in the South? Does producing and buying local mean lowest carbon emissions? What are the real motivations of city dwellers purchasing locally grown food and what are the consequences of their actions? In this debate, we will critically discuss the role of local food systems in building sustainable and resilient urban development in the face of wider popular discourses that position localism as an end goal with inherent economic, social and ecological benefits.
www.ruaf.org
Sustainable Urban Food Provisioning (RUAF, 2015)
SMEs & Sustainable Urban Food Provisioning (RUAF, 2015)
Monday 9 November - The global city: a blessing or a curse?
Erik Swyngedouw (University of Manchester)
Jeroen van der Waal (Erasmus University Rotterdam)
Moderator: Ben Derudder (Ghent University)
Presentation Swyngedouw
Presentation van der Waal
This debate investigates the link between global city formation and social polarization. Global city formation entails the process by which core economic activities, from the delivery of elementary goods to the provision of legal and financial advice, shift from the local to the trans-national level. In contrast to earlier production periods, in which prominent cities operated mainly for their immediate hinterland and vice versa, global cities are featured by a widespread geographic dispersal of economic activities. Global city theory argues that this dynamic fosters social polarization. On the one hand, global cities attract service-dominated and internationally oriented firms, in need of both high and low-skilled labor. On the other hand, economic sectors persevering middle classes, like car manufacturing companies, tend to relocate. In this debate we discuss the social impact of global city formation. When is a city to be considered as a global city? And are these global cities indeed showing a tendency towards social polarization, as global city theory argues, or are its effects mediated by domestic factors, like the strength of labor unions and/or social policies? By digging deeper into theories of globalization and by drawing upon case study knowledge, this debate seeks to elucidate the question whether global city formation should be propelled (and seen as a blessing) or mediated (and thus seen as a curse).
Monday 16 November - Urban transport: how to reach our destination?
Xavier Godard (independent consultant)
Honoré Paelinck (visiting professor at University of Antwerp)
Moderator: Bruno De Borger (University of Antwerp)
Rapid population growth, suburbanization, economic growth, and motorization are some of the challenges that growing cities around the world are currently facing. While transport infrastructure, services and systems that originated in industrialized countries have often been rather blindly transferred to the developing world, it is now widely acknowledged that urban transport policy and planning challenges in the developing world differ considerably from those characterizing urban areas of the developed world. In broad terms, the fast pace of urbanization and motorization, the high travel demand, limited resources, ineffective governance ,and lack of democracy and public participation are often exacerbating general urban transport problems in cities in developing countries. Consequently, pathways to address the highly inadequate urban transport conditions for the majority of the population need to be discussed. Given the complexity of the topic, many different questions may enter this debate. How we can make urban transport efficient, accessible and affordable for all (sub)urban dwellers? How to bring together formal and informal modes of transportation, including private cars, pedestrians, buses, moto taxis etc.? Who should have the lead or at least a say in the planning of the urban transport system? Are mega projects and private sector involvement the new panacea? Which opportunities lie ahead and where should we go from here?
Xavier Godard has for many years focused his research and expertise activities on developing countries, especially Africa. During his 35 years working at Inrets (the French Institute for Research in Transport and Road Safety) he conducted analyses and project assessments on urban transport and mobility in developed (1969-1981) and developing countries (2000-2009). Additionally, Xavier Godard was the Scientific Committee Chairman of several CODATU conferences (e.g. Caracas 1982, Sao Paulo 1990, Lomé 2002). Even though he retired from Inrets (later transformed into Ifstar) in 2009, he kept working on an independent basis. His main research theme is mobility and travel needs analysis, including the analysis of the various modes of transportation that can be found in urban (and regional) transport systems and the appraisal of transport policies and projects. He is a recognized specialist of urban transport in Africa, with a focus on paratransit and urban poor mobility needs. Due to his expertise, he was asked to act as an advisor on several occasions (e.g. UN-Habitat report on “planning and design for sustainable urban mobility” published in 2013). Moreover, he guided PhD students in preparing their doctoral theses on urban transport in African cities up to his retirement in 2008.
Honoré Paelinck is a former World Bank consultant on transport. He has led several transport companies, including the Belgian Railways in 1987. More information.
Monday 23 November - Megacities: lands of opportunities or cities of disappointments?
Alastair Donald (Future Cities Project; British Council)
Vanesa Castán Broto (University College London)
Moderator: Tom Coppens (University of Antwerp)
Presentation Donald
Presentation Broto
Today, an estimated 7% of the world’s total population live in 29 megacities, which are usually defined as metropolitan areas with more than 10 million people – the largest being Tokyo with a population of 37 million. This number is expected to rise further over the next 35 years with an urban population growing at phenomenal rates in developing countries. Many celebrate the mushrooming of megacities all around the world as they tend to produce more wealth and offer more to the unremitting rural poverty. They see megacities, including their slums, as centres for social changes and creativity and that create new opportunities for economic development and better standard of living for society as a whole because there are gateways to global markets. On the other hand, those opposed to this super-urbanisation argue that even with solid economic growth, megacities are not necessarily becoming better places to live. They contend that large infrastructure projects destroy people’s lives and are more beneficial to large corporate firms than to ordinary people to live their lives. Moreover, they suggest that megacities are poverty traps for many citizens who wanted to escape hopeless poverty in their village but who are faced with economically uncertain existence, diseases, urban violence, and natural disasters. Are megacities desirable or even necessary? Do megacities represent an opportunity or a dystopia? Can megacities offer pleasant life for all ? Alastair Donald from the Future Cities Project and Vanesa Castan Broto from University College London will discuss these important topics during this 5th debate of our series on Urban Dynamics in the Age of Cities.
Twitter: @MaximumCities
Twitter: @VaneBailo
(cancelled) Monday 30 November - Superdiversity: an answer to structural inequality?
Ben Rogaly (University of Sussex)
Paul Watt (University of London)
Moderator: Stijn Oosterlynck (University of Antwerp)
This debate was cancelled due to transport issues
Many cities in the world are becoming increasingly diversified and complex. In contrast to previous modes of multi-culturalism, with a clear distinction between minority and majority groups, current urban dynamics jeopardize this social fabric in favor of cities where only minorities hold sway – a trend captured by the term ‘superdiversity’. This debate seeks to investigate the link between superdiversity and structural inequality. For one, superdiversity provides economic, social and political opportunities for many people and social groups, given that the control of strategic goods, like state resources and import and export channels, get less centralized and hence more accessible. For the other, however, superdiversity implies a mere continuation of past patterns of migration, structurally layered, and thus consolidating traditional forms of inequality. Questions that will be addressed during this session are: how does superdiversity affect structural inequality? What new forms of structural mobility do we witness within such a context? And what happens with power relations within cities that are super-diverse? Answers will be formulated by zooming in on social dynamics within certain city neighborhoods in Western societies and beyond.
Monday 7 December - City tourism: reason to cheer or protest?
Johannes Novy (Technical University Berlin)
Fabian Frenzel (University of Leicester and Potsdam)
Moderator: Steven De Craen (ViaVia Tourism Academy)
Presentation Novy
Presentation Frenzel
Tourism has been a rapidly growing sector and is considered as one of the main economic development resources in many cities in both developing and developed countries. Many local actors are being mobilized too present their city in initiatives that are set up to further stimulate the growth of the tourism sector. Yet, such initiatives have also led to contestations of and conflicts over the impacts of the expanding tourism on urban spaces and on the life of residents in particular. In those disputes, most attention is given to the potentially negative effects tourism might have on neighborhoods, local communities and urban environment. In that sense, it is not really surprising that newly emerging activities such as slum tourism provoke some strong opinions. Slum tourism is a type of tourism which ‘allows’ tourist to ‘observe’ people living in poverty and has become increasingly popular (partly due to the global success of the movie ‘Slumdog Millionaire’). While opponents argue that such practices are an invasion into the privacy of the local residents and should therefore be considered as an unethical way of generating income, those in favor argue that it is a promising tool to understand and eradicate poverty. In sum, the debate will discuss the opportunities and challenges that arise when trying to generate a positive impact of tourism on local resident.
twitter.com/fabnomad
www2.le.ac.uk/departments/management/people/ffrenzel
leicester.academia.edu/FabianFrenzel
Moderator: Steven De Craen (ViaVia Tourism Academy)