Edition 2016 - What future for democracy?
For a long time, liberal democracy has been perceived as an indicator of social welfare. At present, however, democracy is at a crossroads. Not only are there several authoritarian states quite efficient at promoting economic growth, there are also quite a few western democracies challenged from within due to rising populism and from outside because of technocratic and non-democratic institutions.
Likewise, many democracies seem to lose their appetite when it comes to promoting their model abroad. Instead, they prefer security and stability. Against this background, how should we understand the future of democracy? What are its challenges? And what are its main weaknesses? These and several other questions will be addressed during this Debating Development series.
Tuesday 18 October - Foreign funding for civil society: enhancing or undermining democracy?
Jonas Wolff (Peace Research Institute Frankfurt)
Pieter-Jan Hamels (11.11.11)
Moderator: Filip Reyntjens (UAntwerpen)
Presentation by Jonas Wolff (click here)
In many countries, civil society organizations (CSOs) involved in peacebuilding and democracy promotion rely on foreign funds from bilateral donors, NGOs, or multilateral agencies such as the UNDP to support their programs. However, over the past decade many governments have pushed back, resulting in a “closing space” for democracy promotion. Governments have curtailed foreign funding, either by outright prohibition (e.g. Eritrea) or by enacting onerous requirements or restrictions (e.g. India, Zimbabwe, Bangladesh, Russia, Hungary, Kenya) that severely limit foreign funding to domestic CSOs. Scholars, activists, and practitioners have warned of the adverse effect this has on democracy since it enables authoritarian or oppressive governments to curtail human rights advocacy and civic activism. However, others have pointed out that there are valid reasons for governments to eschew foreign funds: historically, development assistance has often included opportunistic intervention and economic exploitation. Foreign funding can thus represent an extension of neo-colonial power, or the imposition of particular Western values and normative ideas of democracy, thus undermining national sovereignty and the right to collective self-determination.
Twitter: @freyntje
Tuesday 25 October - The role of education in peacebuilding and democratization processes
Simone Datzberger (University of Amsterdam)
Marielle Le Mat (University of Amsterdam)
Moderator: Line Kuppens (KU Leuven and University of Antwerp)
Presentation by Simone Datzberger
Readings
The role of education in peacebuilding and democratization processes
Education plays a major role in development frameworks, especially in conflict-ridden societies working toward peacebuilding and democracy. Education and schooling create opportunities and foster a sense of citizenship while equipping students with important skills and instilling tolerance for diversity. However, there can be negative impacts as well: in conflict zones working toward national peace, the curricula may portray only the victor’s version of history, stoking conflict between ethnic or religious groups. The use of one national language for schools can ease inter-ethnic tension by providing a shared means of communication, but it can also foster exclusion and repression of those who do not speak the dominant language. What lessons can the development community learn from diverse contexts about using education to promote, rather than hinder, peacebuilding and democracy?
Twitter: @SimoneDatzberge
Marielle is involved in several project partnerships, including the Research Consortium on Education and Peacebuilding and the IS Academy Education & International Development, as junior researcher and as junior project manager.
Twitter: @LineKuppens
Tuesday 8 November - The struggle for democracy after the Arab Spring
Christopher Lamont (Osaka University and University of Groningen)
Paul Aarts (University of Amsterdam)
Moderator: Pieter Stockmans (MO* Magazine)
The Arab Spring brought an end to the region’s prevailing governance systems, as multiple dictatorships got overthrown. Although the democracy fever spread intensively, about five years later the situation in these countries is possibly even worse as citizens are confronted with civil war, strife and the rise of jihadism. It is clear that countries with weak institutions and without any tradition of democracy cannot change into thriving democratic societies overnight. But what will the future bring for these countries? What are exactly the key challenges that have to be overcome to develop into a stable democracy? And what happened to the support for democracy among the citizens?
Tuesday 22 November - How to combat terrorism while upholding democracy?
Judith Large (Conflict Analysis Research Centre - UK)
Belgin San-Akca (Koç University Istanbul)
Moderator: Jens Franssen (VRT News)
Presentation of Judith Large
Text by Judith Large (2005)
Today, democratic governments face acute dilemmas in how to react to terrorism and the increasing feeling of risk and insecurity. Securing the safety and protection of their citizens and upholding law are essential tasks of a democratic government. Overreaction, however, can be detrimental for its legitimacy as rights and freedoms could be narrowed by certain security measures. Social and human rights organizations are concerned about the way the war against terrorism is and will be conducted. But how can we combat and prevent terrorism without restricting the foundations of a democratic society?
Twitter: @JensFranssen
Tuesday 15 November - Democratization in Africa: the end of an era?
Nicholas Cheeseman (University of Oxford)
Emmanuel Gyimah-Boadi (Ghana Center for Democratic Development)
Moderator: Stef Vandeginste (University of Antwerp)
In the early nineties, observers witnessed a remarkable improvement in the level of democracy in sub-Saharan Africa. Multi-party elections entered the fray, executive power was curtailed by binding constitutions and civil society organizations and independent media platforms flourished far and wide. Yet, the widespread optimism that accompanied this post-Cold War democratization process in sub-Saharan Africa was perhaps a far cry from happenings in the real world. With the benefit of hindsight, one can say that many African elections became tools of, rather than answers to, authoritarian control and that constitutions were recurrently bypassed as rulers saw fit. Likewise, many media and civil society organizations had to deal with the constant threat of closure and intimidation by incumbents. This debate questions what is left of this earlier optimism of democratization in sub-Saharan Africa. Will democratization continue on the continent? And should the recent backslide be seen as only temporary, to be reinitialized by the rise of an educated, wealthier middle class, urbanization and technology? Or are we awaiting a new era of authoritarianism, with all the domestic and international challenges it brings along?
Twitter: @Fromagehomme
Tuesday 29 November - Participation vs. representation: the democratic fatigue syndrome
Carsten Berg (European Citizens’ Initiative)
Stefan Rummens (KU Leuven)
Moderator: Stefaan Walgrave (University of Antwerp)
Some claim that political representation is facing a crisis. Populism is on the rise in numerous European countries and across the Atlantic. Party membership is declining, voter turnout is low, voter turnover is high and trust in our political representation is at an all-time low. These and other symptoms fall under what has been described as the Democratic Fatigue Syndrome.
Efforts to increase participation of the constituents in the democratic process and to combat the symptoms of the Democratic Fatigue Syndrome have come in many forms. The cities of Antwerp and Paris have recently followed the example of Porto Alegre in Brazil and have implemented participatory budgeting. In Ireland citizens helped draft a new constitution, in Belgium a thousand citizens deliberated about the countries future during the G1000 summit, and across Europe citizens can use the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) right to directly influence European Policies.
During this debate we’ll investigate whether we need to reform our current electoral-representative democracy model to allow for more participation to combat the Democratic Fatigue Syndrome.
Tuesday 6 December - Democracy promotion: an empty shell?
Laurence Whitehead (University of Oxford)
Marie Laure Geoffray (University of Paris III: Sorbonne Nouvelle)
Moderator: Filip Reyntjens (University of Antwerp)
Presentation Whitehead
Billions of dollars are spend every year to promote democracy abroad. The money goes from supporting international (non-)governmental organizations, like Freedom House and the Organization of Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), to financing national elections and starting war. This debate questions the impact of international democracy promotion. Does democracy promotion really foster democratization in non-democratic countries? And did it play, for instance, an active role in many of the post-Cold War democratic transitions we observed? Or is democracy promotion merely window dressing, capitalizing on endogenous democratization processes, and increasingly being foiled by the renewed self-confidence of (rising) authoritarian powers?
Twitter: @freyntje