Research team
Expertise
My research focusses on online celebrity bashing. This is a specific type of cyberbullying, in which celebrities become the victim of negative online behavior. I analyse this phenomenon with a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. During my PhD, I used focus groups, interviews, content analyses, surveys and SEM Models. During my post-doc I mostly work with experimental research in which adolescents are exposed to celebrity bashing and then also receive the chance to write online comments themselves.
Meat, Men & Masculinites: How the (non) consumption of meat relates to personal, interpersonal, and cultural communication, focusing on connections between "meat", "men" and "masculinity".
Abstract
Food is about nutrition and health as much as it is about communication. The food choices we make relate to our identity, our interactions, and our culture. While research on food and health is abundant, research into food as a process of communication remains scarce. Charlotte De Backer fills this niche with her research (https://www.uantwerpen.be/en/projects/food-media-society/). At current De Backer and colleagues mainly look at how to effectively communicate about food (cSBO InFlOOD, FWO project, VLAIO- Meat The Challenge). The focus of the running projects is on how communication influences food consumption behavior. The goal of this Meat, Men & Masculinities proposal is to also study how food choices influence communication. The starting point of this proposal is the widespread cultural belief that "real men eat meat", and the growing resistance towards this idea. Together with Gaëlle Ouvrein, De Backer is currently conducting pilot studies that show that meat eaters and vegetarians/vegans stereotype each other and react to bashing comments in ways that ache towards polarization, especially among male populations. Ouvrein, an international expert in (celebrity) bashing behavior is therefore co-supervisor of this proposal. Departing from the socio-ecological model, this Meat, Men & Masculinities project will study how choices to eat or not to eat meat interact with communication processes at the level of (1) the individual, (2) interpersonal interactions and (3) culture. First, at the level of the individual, it is well known that, compared to women, men have stronger pro-meat attitudes that manifest at both explicit rational- and implicit, unconscious levels. We have recently shown, however, that not all men are alike, and that differences in masculine identities predict differences in men's explicit attitudes towards meat consumption. The question that will be addressed in this proposal is if similar differences in masculinities can also predict differences in attitudes and motives at unconscious, implicit levels. Implicit attitudes and motives are less prone to cultural change, but if these can be changed, they offer a more powerful and sustainable end goal for interventions. Second, at the level of culture, mass media messages about food increase in number every day. Research has shown that mass media reinforce beliefs like "real men eat meat", but these studies are outdated and scant attention has been paid to online media messages about Meat, Men & Masculinities. We thus aim to study if and how current print- and online media frame factual information about Meat, Men & Masculinities. To narrow down online media, we will focus on Instagram and Twitter, known for their abundant, and often outspoken messages about food. Third, focusing on the interpersonal level, it is known that meat is a moralizing topic, and there are assumptions that meat polarizes people into those who do and do not eat meat. We plan to empirically investigate if this is the case, and how this in the end also relates to communication at the individual and cultural level. For all this, we plan to adopt a holistic multimethod approach. Quantitative and qualitative content analyses will be used to study media messages about Meat, Men & Masculinities. Self-report (online) surveys will be combined with psychophysiological measures to investigate how men self-identify in relation to meat, react to (social) media messages about meat, and interact with meat eaters and vegetarians/vegans. In the end the outcomes of this project will lead to a profound understanding of how a seemingly simple choice to "eat or not to eat meat" operates as an important message at the level of personal, interpersonal and cultural communication. This knowledge will have the potential to impact communication strategies of health professionals and marketeers that urgently look for solutions to convince avid (most often male) meat eaters to reduce their meat intake.Researcher(s)
- Promoter: De Backer Charlotte
- Co-promoter: Ouvrein Gaëlle
- Fellow: Peeters Amber
Research team(s)
Project type(s)
- Research Project
An investigation into the short and long term effects of exposure to online celebrity bashing among adolescent bystanders.
Abstract
Dit project stelt een studie voor rond een zeer specifieke, doch, vaak voorkomende vorm van online agressie: online celebrity bashing. Celebrity bashing verwijst naar het negatief berichten over en becommentariëren van celebrities. De celebrity-bashers kunnen zowel journalisten, mensen uit het publiek als andere celebrities zijn. Het doel van dit project is om meer kennis te verwerven over wat er gebeurt op het moment dat adolescenten regelmatig met dit fenomeen geconfronteerd worden online. Meer bepaald zal dit project de causale link onderzoeken tussen bloostelling aan de verschillende types van celebrity bashing en zelf een dader worden van celebrity bashing en de onderliggende rol van attitudes in deze relatie. Dit project bouwt verder op bestaand onderzoek rond online celebrity bashing, en neemt de belangrijkste tekortkoming ervan mee in rekening, namelijk de cross-sectionele aard ervan. Door gebruik te maken van een dagboekmethode en een zelf-ontwikkelde app die gebruikt zal worden voor de datacollectie, zullen we in staat zijn inzicht te krijgen in de confrontatie van jongeren met celebrity bashing en de mogelijke effecten ervan op lange termijn en in een natuurlijke context. Dit project zal in staat zijn om een beter zicht te krijgen op de impact van celebrity bashing op adolescenten en celebrities, wat essentieel is voor de ontwikkeling van effectieve preventie- en interventie-initiatieven.Researcher(s)
- Promoter: Ouvrein Gaëlle
Research team(s)
Project type(s)
- Research Project
In the Spotlight: The Effects of Celebrity Bashing on (young) Bystanders and Victims.
Abstract
This project covers a study on a very specifc, though, prominent type of online aggression: Celebrity bashing. Celebrity bashing refers to the negative and scandal-inspired way of commenting toward and about celebrities, and can be performed by journalists, the audience and other celebrities. This project aims to enrich our knowledge on this phenomenon by investigating both the perspective of adolescent perpetrators as well as the perspective of celebrity-victims. On the side of the perpetrator, we will investigate the causal link between being a bystander of the different types of celebrity bashing and becoming a perpetrator and the underlying processes that might explain this association (mediators), and contextual factors (i.e., type of the perpetrator, type of the involved celebrity) moderating this association (moderators). This will be guided by the General Aggression Model (GAM). On the side of the celebrity-victim, we will investigate celebrities' feelings and coping strategies when being confronted with bashing. This project will increase our insights on the impact of celebrity bashing on adolescents and celebrities, and thus provide evidence for the development of effective prevention and intervention initiatives.Researcher(s)
- Promoter: Vandebosch Heidi
- Co-promoter: De Backer Charlotte
- Fellow: Ouvrein Gaëlle
Research team(s)
Project type(s)
- Research Project
Examining the Effects of Media Celebrity Bashing and Celebrity Testimonials on Cyberbullying amongst Adolescents.
Abstract
In this project we will investigate the influence of celebrity stories on cyberbullying amongst adolescents. On the one hand, this will be done from a news media effects perspective: does exposure to "celebrity bashing" by news media lead to cyberbullying behavior? On the other hand, this will be done from a narrative intervention perspective: are celebrity testimonials effective in persuading adolescents not to cyberbully or in providing support to victims. In this way the project will fill important gaps in the existing knowledge on macro influences (in casu: media influences) on cyberbullying behavior, and on evidence-based methods to change cyberbullying behavior and its mental health outcomes.Researcher(s)
- Promoter: Vandebosch Heidi
- Fellow: Ouvrein Gaëlle
Research team(s)
Project type(s)
- Research Project