Research Karel Neels

Abstract

Research into health and well-being has historically been neglected in critical populations, particularly in women, children, and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. This global issue, characterized by systemic neglect and underfunding, underscores an urgent need for research centres to spearhead transformative initiatives. A multidisciplinary approach is pivotal in addressing these disparities effectively. Our proposal introduces the establishment of the "U-MaMi" Research Centre of Excellence, designed as an integrated ecosystem to drive impactful research, innovation, education, policy, and community engagement, with a keen focus on health equity and microbiome-centric research. This ecosystem involves principal investigators and their team members from key disciplines to achieve these goals: microbiology and microbiome research (Sarah Lebeer), bioethics (Kristien Hens), general medicine (Veronique Verhoeven), paediatrics (Stijn Verhulst), ear-nose-throat specialication (Olivier Vanderveken), sociology (Karel Neels) and marketing (Annouk Lievens). With the chosen name for our centre, "U-MaMi," we do not only recognize the pivotal role of mothers and 'maternal microbes' in shaping the microbiome and health of their children, but also emphasize the importance of a united and inclusive perspective on health and health equity to drive transformative actions.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Lebeer Sarah
• Co-promoter: Hens Kristien
• Co-promoter: Lievens Annouk
• Co-promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Vanderveken Olivier
• Co-promoter: Verhoeven Veronique
• Co-promoter: Verhulst Stijn

Research team(s)

• Laboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (LAMB)

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The share of young adults who have parents with a migration background (2nd generation) or who migrated as children (intermediate or 1.5 generation) is increasing in societies across Europe. Patterns of family formation in the 1.5 and 2nd generation are increasingly attracting attention of academia and policymakers because of the potential impact they may have on future demographic trends in Europe. This impact will differ, however, depending on whether the 1.5 and 2nd generation retain distinctive patterns of family formation with respect to timing of parenthood and number of children, or whether patterns of family formation in migrant populations can be expected to converge to those in majority populations. Research on family formation in general populations has shown that lengthening educational trajectories and variation in labour market opportunities induced by economic cycles have strongly affected the number of children and particularly the timing of parenthood. In contrast, the literature on migrant fertility to date has largely focused on development of appropriate indicators and changes over subsequent generations, whereas the association between economic cycles and fertility in migrant populations has not been addressed, let alone variation of this association across origin groups and migrant generations. Considering the differential labour market opportunities available to migrants and natives, theories of migrant fertility give rise to conflicting hypotheses on whether patterns of family formation in the 1.5 and 2nd generation can be expected to converge to natives, which have remained largely untested. Given these gaps in the literature, this project uses unique longitudinal microdata from Belgian social security registers to i) study variation in the association between economic cycles and family formation in the 1.5 and 2nd generation in Belgium around the Great Depression (2005-2017) across origin groups and migrant generations, and ii) determine the extent to which differential labour market opportunities and employment instability at the individual, couple and household level mediate this association. The project considers four levels of analysis. First, the project considers how the association between aggregate economic indicators and family formation varies across origin groups and migrant generations. Second, the project analyses how differential employment stability at the individual-level mediates the association between economic cycles and family formation across origin groups and migrant generations. Third, the project considers couple dynamics to determines whether partners accumulate labour market precariousness, or whether compensation takes place between partners. Fourth and finally, given the higher prevalence of multigenerational and extended households in specific migrant populations, the project analyses whether households buffer or exacerbate the effect of individual employment instability on the number of children and timing of parenthood through processes of accumulation or compensation.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Marynissen Leen

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Considerable differences exist between the labour market outcomes of individuals with and individuals without a migration background. Hence, the labour market integration of the large and increasing shares of second generation migrants stands high on both academic and policy agendas throughout Europe. However, a major limitation characterises the literature (and policies) on the labour market integration of individuals with a migration background: the dominant individual perspective which ignores gender dynamics within couples and the local and social context of labour market integration. This is remarkable given that research on gender dynamics in general populations has repeatedly documented how partners' relative resources impact the gender division of employment within couples, and the widespread idea that second generation migrants often live "in between two worlds". And so, both contextual features (e.g., local employment contexts, local (in)formal childcare availability) and social networks (e.g., family, neighbours) are likely to impact men and women with different migration backgrounds differently and may therefore yield gender dynamics in couples' labour market trajectories. This project responds to these research gaps by adopting a life course perspective and developing a multistate modelling framework to examine how local and social contexts shape gender dynamics in second generation migrant couples' labour market integration.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Fellow: Marynissen Leen

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Women's labour market outcomes differ strongly by migration background. Addressing the underlying mechanisms for varying labour market outcomes is crucial as the successful labour market participation of the large share of migrant origin women is relevant at both the societal and individual level. While research among general populations highlights that women's employment trajectories are strongly interrelated with their family transitions such as union and family formation or union dissolution, little is known on work-family interlinkages among women with a migration background. Moreover, life course research has underlined that prior life course experiences and meso-level (e.g. informal care providers) and macro-level (e.g. accessibility of formal childcare) contexts influence the interplay between work and family trajectories. However, it has remained unexplored to what extent such path-dependencies and contextual factors shape employment trajectories among women with a migration background around key family transitions and entail diverging employment outcomes between origin groups and generations. By considering path-dependencies and contextual factors as life course mechanisms shaping employment trajectories around key family transitions, this project will provide new insights in our understanding of varying labour market outcomes by women's migration background.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Mortelmans Dimitri
• Fellow: Maes Julie

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Since 2013, the "Socio-economic Monitoring" has analysed the situation of individuals with a migration background in the Belgian society in general, and in the labour market in particular. As of 2024, these analyses will be extended to multiple disadvantaged groups (e.g.,gender, age, and disability). These monitoring reports indicate several explanatory factors (e.g., field of study, family situation, etc.). What is missing, however, is a comprehensive quantitative multifactor analysis of those various factors - integrated into a model in the spirit of the traditional Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition - that limit the labour market participation of disadvantaged groups. Such an analysis should approximate differences in employment rates, the nature of work, and wages as closely as possible and identify the factors that contribute most strongly to these differences. The result will provide a better understanding of possible additional factors that either hinder or promote access to (sustainable and qualitative) employment. The aim of this study is therefore to develop a detailed quantitative analysis of the factors contributing to differences in labour market participation and wage levels among 18-64-year-olds based on i) origin, ii) gender, iii) age, iv) education level, and v) disability. Besides analyses for the most recent period, we will also examine whether significant changes have occurred in these differences over the past 10 years and assess the extent to which the changing gap over time can be explained by shifts in the composition of different groups. Consequently, four objectives are central for each of these five groups: Understanding differences in employment, (long-term) unemployment, inactivity, and the nature of employment (e.g., wage, job stability, type of employment, type of status). - Understanding differences in employment, (long-term) unemployment, inactivity, and the nature of employment (e.g., wage, job stability, type of employment, type of status). - Understanding the extent to which differences between groups have changed over the past 10 years. - Estimating the extent to which differences can be explained by a broad set of individual characteristics, household characteristics, and work-related characteristics. - Understanding the factors that have contributed to convergences/divergences in labour market outcomes over time.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Maes Julie
• Co-promoter: Vujić Sunčica
• Co-promoter: Wood Jonas

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The low participation of groups with a large distance to the labor market, women, and groups with a migration background in the labor market in and around the port of Antwerp is seen as a social problem. Consequently, this project employs quantitative and qualitative research methods to identify the latent labor supply of these groups (WP1), to identify barriers to labor force participation (WP2), to map the potential job offers for these groups (WP3) and and identify barriers to hiring for employers (WP4).

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Wood Jonas
• Co-promoter: Neels Karel

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

In a context of accelerated population ageing and shrinking working age populations, the successful labour market integration of migrants is rapidly gaining importance in European societies. However, considerable gaps exist in many countries between the labour market outcomes of natives and both first and second generation migrants. Segmented assimilation theory suggests that different migrant groups assimilate into different segments of the labour market due to variation in individual factors, family dynamics, as well as contextual policy factors. Although the literature on migrants' labour market trajectories has focused on different stages of their life courses, a detailed understanding of how path-dependencies in migrants' labour market trajectories unfold over the life course in interaction with family and policy contexts is lacking. Building on recent methodological developments in life course analysis, this project develops a multistate life course perspective to examine how segmented labour market integration by migration background (i.e. origin and generation) materializes over the life course. In doing so, the project will reveal how differential initial labour market positions shape subsequent labour market trajectories, how such path-dependencies are linked to parallel family biographies (union formation, childbearing and gender dynamics in households), and how previous labour market trajectories affect the uptake and effects of active labour market policies.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Wood Jonas

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Low fertility levels in European countries since the 1970s have been a major force contributing to population ageing. Several individual-level and contextual factors have been proposed to explain changing patterns of fertility, with increasing education and labour force participation, variation in economic cycles and lack of supportive policies in many countries figuring prominently. With the increase of migration since the late 1990s, the potential impact of migrant populations on aggregate fertility trends has recently received increasing attention. While there has been no shortage of candidate causal factors, no integrated modelling framework has hitherto been developed to investigate the interplay between these factors and to assess the actual contribution of various factors to change in aggregate fertility trends. This project aims to improve our understanding of how educational careers and migration background shape fertility, and how these characteristics interact with each other, but also with varying economic and policy contexts. The project integrates models of entry into parenthood and subsequent family formation into a dynamic microsimulation framework that allows to assess the sensitivity of aggregate fertility trends to variation in economic and policy contexts, while acknowledging the constraining effect of population structures that have been shaped by past demographic trends.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Wood Jonas

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The labour market integration of first and second generation migrants stands high on both academic and policy agendas throughout Europe. Nevertheless, considerable differences exist between the labour market outcomes of migrants and natives, which are substantially larger among women than among men. However, current explanations of migrants' labour market trajectories are lacking attention for gender dynamics which might explain differential patterns of migrants' labour market integration. We still have a poor understanding of how migrants' labour market trajectories are shaped by gender dynamics in households (e.g. partners' relative employment, the typical decrease in female employment after childbearing) and gendered local contexts (e.g. local childcare availability, gendered social networks). This is highly remarkable since research on general populations widely agrees on the crucial importance of these factors. Hence, this project integrates a gender and life course perspective to examine how household-level gender dynamics and gendered local contexts shape first and second generation migrants' labour market integration. Methodologically, this project builds on recent developments in life course research by developing a multistate multi-process modelling framework. As such, our findings will substantially further our understanding of gender dynamics in migrants' labour market integration.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Fellow: Marynissen Leen

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The share of individuals with a migration background in European societies is increasing, both directly because of migration and indirectly because migrants' descendants have given rise to an increasingly sizeable second and third generation in countries across Europe. The diversity in terms of migration background is currently limited in older ages groups, but becomes increasingly articulated when considering younger adults and particularly children under age 15. The share of young adults with a migration background in the childbearing age range is set to increase as a result, but the implications of this unfolding diversity on future demographic trends and population dynamics in European countries will largely depend on the fertility behaviour of migrant women who recently settled in the country, and the mechanisms that shape the patterns of family formation of migrant women and their descendants. This project aims to inform the scholarly and (polarized) public debate on the impact of migration on receiving countries by (i) providing more accurate measurement of migrant fertility than currently available, (ii) increasing understanding of the mechanisms that shape family formation in migrant populations, and iii) developing more accurate methods to gauge the potential impact of increasing diversity in terms of migrant background on future demographic trends in European societies. These aims translate into three research objectives and work packages: i) improving measurement of fertility in migrant populations (Research Objective 1), ii) analysing the association between migrant fertility and structural factors (e.g. educational expansion and economic cycles) that have driven shifts in tempo and quantum of fertility in majority populations (Research Objective 2), and iii) development of a dynamic microsimulation model of family formation in migrant populations to assess the potential impact of migrant populations on (future) fertility trends in Belgium (Research Objective 3).

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The share of individuals with a migration background in European societies is increasing, both directly because of migration and indirectly because migrants' descendants have given rise to an increasingly sizeable second and third generation in countries across Europe. The diversity in terms of migration background is currently limited in older ages groups, but becomes increasingly articulated when considering younger adults and particularly children under age 15. The share of young adults with a migration background in the childbearing age range is set to increase as a result, but the implications of this unfolding diversity on future demographic trends and population dynamics in European countries will largely depend on the fertility behaviour of migrant women who recently settled in the country, and the mechanisms that shape the patterns of family formation of migrant women and their descendants. This project aims to inform the scholarly and (polarized) public debate on the impact of migration on receiving countries by (i) providing more accurate measurement of migrant fertility than currently available, (ii) increasing understanding of the mechanisms that shape family formation in migrant populations, and iii) developing more accurate methods to gauge the potential impact of increasing diversity in terms of migrant background on future demographic trends in European societies. These aims translate into three research objectives and work packages: i) improving measurement of fertility in migrant populations (Research Objective 1), ii) analysing the association between migrant fertility and structural factors (e.g. educational expansion and economic cycles) that have driven shifts in tempo and quantum of fertility in majority populations (Research Objective 2), and iii) development of a dynamic microsimulation model of family formation in migrant populations to assess the potential impact of migrant populations on (future) fertility trends in Belgium (Research Objective 3).

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The project involves collaboration with Alicia Adsera (Princeton University) and Marcella Valdivia (OECD) in view of providing two contributions to the OECD International Migration Outlook of 2023. A first contribution involves an illustration using Belgian census and register data of the limits of the Period Total Fertility Rate (period TFR) as a measure of fertility in migrant populations. The period TFR, being directly standardized for age, fails to consider duration of residence which can lead to severe overestimation of fertility levels of first generation migrant women in periods of high migration (see CHAPTER 4 Migrant family building: Recent evidence and implications, p. 111-144). A second contribution involves an illustration using longitudinal microdata from Belgian Social Security Registers of the child penalties incurred by migrant mothers in Belgium. Owing to the longitudinal follow-up, the results indicate that differences in maternal employment between women with and without migrant parentage can largely be traced back to differential labour attachment before the start of family formation (see CHAPTER 5 Labour market integration of migrant mothers, p. 145-202).

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

To alleviate mismatch and labour shortages on the Flemish labour market, it is appropriate to gain insight into the labour potential amongst those who are not working, including the rising share of long-term jobseekers (LTJ). However, there is little research on LTJ in Flanders, making it unclear which levers can be used to remove barriers towards labour market entry for this group. Using a multi-actor mixed-methods approach, this project therefore aims to increase our understanding of i) variation in profiles within the target group LTJ, ii) the effectiveness of services and actions within Active Labour Market Programmes (ALMP) for this specific group, and iii) the effectiveness of actions by the Flemish Employment Office and further needs amongst employers. In work package 1, we make use of qualitative focus group interviews to gain insight into the attitudes towards labour force participation, employability, barriers and needs according to the profile of LTJ. The main shortcoming in existing literature on LTJ activation is the lack of impact evaluations for this specific target group. Consequently, work package 2 combines a Flanders-wide analysis of inflow into and effectiveness of services and actions at VDAB and partners, with a Mixed Methods experimental design in which we use Antwerp and Limburg as laboratory cases for an intervention study. In order to not only answer the question "do ALMP work?" but also to gain insight into why they are (in)effective in leading LTJ to employment, we will follow up a selection of individual cases through longitudinal qualitative research by conducting in-depth interviews with all stakeholders around a trajectory, i.e. with the jobseeker, employer and Employment Office caseworker. Work package 3 focuses on the demand side of the labour market (i.e. employers) and first of all includes an analysis of the effectiveness of actions and further needs among employers through a vignette study across Flanders. In the last work package of this project, we will synthesise the main findings of the previous work packages and organise a stakeholder workshop where the findings will be discussed and validated with the LTJ target group.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Wood Jonas
• Co-promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Vujić Sunčica

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Imagine getting post-doc time from us. Post-doc time with the sole obligation to prepare a post-doc proposal to apply for – and ideally obtain - your own research grant. The Centre for Population, Family and Health of the University of Antwerp is launching a competition to attract talented PhDs in the Social Sciences who want to pursue their careers in our research centre. For this challenge, you will write a scientific essay describing a problem that urgently needs to be researched. The problem also needs academic attention from a European comparative perspective and touches on issues from social demography, family sociology and/or the sociology of disease and health. You document the problem with an empirical analysis, preferably in a comparative perspective. When elaborating the essay, you pay particular attention to issues of gender and/or social inequality. The winner's essay will be submitted to Population Europe for publication in their Pop Digest series.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Mortelmans Dimitri
• Co-promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Van de Velde Sarah
• Co-promoter: Wouters Edwin
• Fellow: Maes Julie

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Unprecedented increases in female employment and declining fertility levels have undoubtedly been the most important household transformations in post-war Europe. In response to these changes, European governments developed policies geared towards the reconciliation of (female) employment and family formation such as formal childcare and parental leave. Higher fertility and a relatively weak tension between work and family in countries like Belgium and Sweden suggest that these policies are effective. However, in the context of increasingly diverse European populations, particularly in forerunner countries, a new question has come to the fore: Do these policies 'work' for migrants' descendants? In the face of this new question, the COPE-project provides two major contributions. First, migrants' descendants' uptake and effects of work-family policies, depending on the design features of such policies in Belgium and Sweden are addressed using the richest register data available. Second, adopting a mixed methods research design for the Belgian case, the COPE-project benefits from the complementarity of quantitative and qualitative methods to study both differential patterns in uptake and effects by natives' origin, but also develop indepth understanding of how mechanisms of uptake and effects vary by origin. Our findings will be of utmost importance to policy-makers in the context of inclusive social policies, but also labour supply in the era of population ageing.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Fellow: Wood Jonas

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

"Superdiversity" stands central in Flanders. This high degree of diversity implies that the number of people with a migration background is steadily increasing, but also increasingly heterogeneous. In order to be able to tailor policy to this superdiversity, it is essential to observe and analyse the position of groups with a migration background in different domains. To gain insight into domains that cannot be investigated on the basis of variables available in administrative databases, the Flemish Government launched the "Samenleven in Diversiteit" (SID) survey in 2017 (Stuyck et al., 2018). This survey focuses in particular on people with a Moroccan, Turkish, Polish, Romanian and Congolese background, groups that are typically underrepresented in other surveys. This research deals with diversity and integration as transversal concepts that relate to a wide range of themes and policy domains. In this follow-up study we focus on diversity and integration in individual behaviours, attitudes and experiences. We distinguish seven societal domains: (1) education and educational experiences of children, (2) labour market positions, (3) language skills and language use, (4) civic integration courses, (5) diversity and social contacts, (6) social participation and (7) attitudes towards diversity and the position of religion in society. We aim to address four broad research goals: 1. Operationalization of the concept migration background in the SID sample; 2. Documenting variation in the seven societal domains by migration background; 3. To study the extent to which variation in the seven societal domains by migration background can be explained by socio-demographic background characteristics, socio-economic characteristics or socio-cultural profiles; 4. To map the mutual dynamics between the societal domains, with special attention to spill-over effects for groups with a migrant background.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Wood Jonas
• Co-promoter: Neels Karel

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Between 2015 and 2030 welfare states throughout Europe (including Belgium) will face the long-term implications of the babyboom and subsequent babybust in the latter part of the 20th century: the large cohorts of the 1950s and 1960s will gradually enter retirement, while the small cohorts born since the mid 1970s are not sufficiently large to offset the shrinking labour force. The 2001 report of the United Nations on replacement migration estimated that a significant increase of migration (compared to levels of the mid 1990s) would be required to maintain the size of the working age population in Europe. In contrast to expectations and despite wide scepticism regarding to the UN migration prospects, immigration has substantially increased throughout Europe since the early 2000s, exceeding the migration volumes of the 1950s and 1960s by a considerable margin. However, throughout Europe the employment levels of migrant populations are significantly lower than is the case among natives, fuelling scepticism in the public debate with respect to replacement migration. Although the overrepresentation of second and later generation migrants in unemployment has been documented repeatedly, as well as the overrepresentation of first generation migrants in social assistance, only a limited body of work has hitherto been able to access existing register data to address the uptake and impact of active labour market programmes (ALMP's) and (labour force) integration policies on labour market outcomes for first and second generation migrants. This project uses a novel data infrastructure that was developed in a preceding VIONA-project (Flemish Government) which aimed to link longitudinal register data from integration offices, employment offices and social security organisations in order to reconstruct and analyse labour market trajectories of both the resident population with a migration background (second and later generation migrants) and new migrants entering the country in the period 2005-2016 (first generation migrants), including asylum seekers. Given this highly innovative research infrastructure – in tandem with the fact that different migration profiles can be considered - this project will contribute to the scarce literature on the effectiveness of different integration and employment policies to labour market integration of individuals with a migration background, while additionally shedding light on the variation in the effectiveness of such policies for different migrant groups as the barriers that second and later generation migrants, first generation migrants (e.g. family formation and reunification) and asylum seekers face in entering the labour market are different. The project aims to continue the collaboration with the various regional stakeholders involved in the construction of the data-infrastructure and envisages the valorisation of the research findings in collaboration with local and regional actors in the field of labour market and integration policies.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Wood Jonas
• Fellow: Kasztan Tair

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

In recent decades, European societies witnessed an unprecedented increase in women's labour force participation. The rise of gender equity in education and labour markets has not been mirrored, however, by a similar shift of gender equity in families and households. The division of household work continues to be strongly gendered and labour force participation around parenthood shows more variation among women than men. Micro-economic theories account for gender specialization in (un)paid work by bargaining based on relative socio-economic positions of partners. However, as women increasingly outperform men in terms of earning potential, the persistence of traditional gender specialization in households is paradoxical. In contrast, gender identity theories suggest that couples conform to and reproduce gender roles, and that decisions regarding family formation and the parental division of (un)paid labour strongly depend on cultural norms. Using detailed register-based panel data for Belgium and comparative panel data for Europe, this project studies couples' labour force participation around parenthood. We assess whether economic preconditions for parenthood (financial resources, time availability, job security) are gendered and subsequently analyse whether the relative socio-economic position of partners can account for the reinforcement of gender roles following parenthood, or whether gender roles persist despite the changing relative labour market position of women.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Van de Velde Sarah

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The chair on Migration, Integration and Labour Markets is a colloborative research project with the Flemish government on the labour market position of individuals with a migration background in Flanders, with specific focus on the labour on the labour market position of migrant women and the effectiveness of (labour market) integration trajectories targeting recent migrants. The project is innovative in that aims to integrate register data on i) integration trajectories, ii) education and activation trajectories and iii) work permits with longitudinal microdata drawn from the Crossroads Bank for Social Security to reconstruct and analyse labour market trajectories of resident and new migrants using advanced hazard and econometric models. Throughout the project interviews and focus groups are set up with both participants and counselors to bring additional insight to the longitudinal analysis of trajectories based on register data.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Raeymaeckers Peter
• Co-promoter: Vujić Sunčica

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project website

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The project aims to enhance our understanding of the socio-economic trajectories of people with a migration background, by focusing on three interconnected domains (work packages): the individual, the household and the firm. An extensive international body of research studies the labour market outcomes of people with a migration background, producing inconclusive views on why people with a migration background fare worse than their native counterparts. Human capital theory in a migration context claims that increased demand for a highly-educated workforce has raised the education premium and punishes the less skilled more severely (Katz and Autor, 1999; Baldwin and Beckstead, 2003). Authors find that first generation migrants are often endowed with lower levels and different kinds of human capital than those necessary to fare successfully in western labour markets (Heath and Cheung, 2007). An alternative stream of literature emphasizes the occurrence of different degrees of success in the labour market integration of newcomers (Neels, 2001; Euwals et al. 2007; Baert and Cockx, 2013). The human capital thesis is challenged by segmented assimilation theories rejecting that first generation migrants' disadvantages may weaken over time. Segmented assimilation theories indeed are less optimistic about the potential of education and other factors in explaining first generation migrants' weak labour market position. While some groups have an abundance of opportunities, others face multiple disadvantages, including insufficient social resources and discriminatory processes. There is increasing evidence that many first generation migrants face persistent labour market barriers that threaten their full integration (Fuller, 2011 ). Another factor that negatively affects first generation migrants' investment in the native labour market is the prevalence of discrimination. Even after controlling for human capital and after adjusting for host country characteristics, first generation migrants are often still disadvantaged. A potential, but again only partial, explanation is that first generation migrants face some form of discrimination in the labour market, either directly (Kalleberg and Soresen, 1979) or indirectly (Heath and Cheung, 2007). But the fact that people with a migration background have a harder time getting hired, just as young natives and older employees, does not necessarily directly point to discrimination. Literature equally points to rigidities in the labour market that make it harder for outsiders to find their way in. Strict employment protection makes hiring and firing decisions costly, which reduces the chance of 'risky' hires, such as people with a migration background whose human and cultural capital is much harder to gauge (Kogan, 2006).

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The generations approaching retirement age have witnessed a double shift in family behaviours: a breakdown of traditional patterns of family formation, and an even larger diversity of families among their adult children. This project measures the impact of these increasingly complex lifecourses on intergenerational solidarity within families and look at upward (personal care) and downward (childcare) solidarity and the intervening role of health.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Mortelmans Dimitri
• Co-promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Wouters Edwin

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

The project consists of two major parts. The first part investigates gender and socio-economic differentials in the uptake of childcare and parental leave and investigates how uptake is associated to maternal employment. The second part investigates how policy uptake subsequently affects fertility outcomes. Our research addresses the question whether the small positive effects of childcare and parental leave on female employment and fertility are due to family policies being largely ineffective, or whether these weak effects are due to the fact that studies typically use aggregate indicators and fail to account for population heterogeneity in uptake and effects of family policies.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Since the 1970s Belgium and most European countries have witnessed a baby bust, with period fertility levels declining below the replacement level of 2.1 children per woman. This project analyses recent trends in union and family formation in Belgium and aims to assess how patterns of family formation are likely to develop in the near future. In addressing this research question, the project considers four factors that are particularly relevant: i) the increase of female educational attainment and labour force participation and the recursive relationship between family formation and the socio-economic position of individuals and households, ii) the increasing diversity of living arrangements in European countries and the recursive relationship between living arrangements and fertility outcomes, iii) the increasing importance of family policies in reducing the incompatibility between labour force participation and family formation and socio-economic differentials in the uptake of family policies, and iv) the evolution of patterns of family formation and labour force participation in immigrant populations and the impact of increasing migration on demographic trends in Belgium at an aggregate level. The project uses longitudinal data from the Crossroads Bank for Social Security to construct a longitudinal prospective panel that spans the period from the mid 1990s to 2010. This panel includes detailed measures of the living arrangement and socio-economic position of approximately 100000 women and their co-resident household members throughout the observation period. In addition, the supplementary samples have been drawn to include immigrants (and their co-resident household members) who settled in Belgium after 1998 to maintain the representativity of the panel throughout the period considered. The detailed and continuous measurement of socio-economic position and living arrangements provides a unique opportunity to assess the recursive relationship between these factors and family formation (e.g. disentangling the effect of initial socio-economic position and/or living arrangements on entry into parenthood and subsequently assessing the effect of parenthood on socio-economic position/living arrangement). The project is integrated in an international network on register-based research in demography.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Fellow: Kil Tine

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project represents a formal research agreement between UA and the Flemish Public Service. UA provides the Flemish Public Service research results mentioned in the title of the project under the conditions as stipulated in this contract. The main objective is to investigate the media representation of young parenthood on Flemish television and its reception among socially vulnerable young people.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Paulussen Steve
• Co-promoter: Dhoest Alexander
• Co-promoter: Maeseele Pieter
• Co-promoter: Mortelmans Dimitri
• Co-promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Ponnet Koen
• Co-promoter: Vandebosch Heidi
• Co-promoter: Van den Bulck Hilde
• Co-promoter: Walrave Michel

Research team(s)

• Antwerp Media in Society Centre (AMSoC)

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project represents a formal research agreement between UA and on the other hand the Federal Public Service. UA provides the Federal Public Service research results mentioned in the title of the project under the conditions as stipulated in this contract.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Following issues will be investigated: i) how educational attainment is used to study socio-economic differentials in family formation and how these are in turn affected by ii) the effects of economic conditions, iii) changing living arrangements and iv) attitudes toward gender equity. For each of these effects we explore how policy context is expected to mediate the impact on socio-economic differentials.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Ghysels Joris

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This study assesses whether Belgium's decentralised activation policy in social assistance is effective in guiding social assistance beneficiaries towards sustainable employment. Recently, many states have rescaled their social assistance schemes due to activation. This has given rise to a lively international debate on the optimal distribution of competences between government levels. We aim to contribute substantially to, firstly, the mainly economic and political literature on social federalism, and secondly, the social policy literature on the effectiveness of social activation policies.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Van den Bosch Karel
• Co-promoter: Neels Karel

Research team(s)

• Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project represents a formal research agreement between UA and on the other hand the Federal Public Service. UA provides the Federal Public Service research results mentioned in the title of the project under the conditions as stipulated in this contract.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel
• Co-promoter: Mortelmans Dimitri

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

Fertility trends in Europe since the 1970 are frequently referred to in terms of postponement and subreplacement fertility. The effects of family policy seem modest, but studies addressing the differential effect of measures depending on educational level and labour market position are scarce. This project investigates how socio-economic fertility differentials have developed in Europe between 1970 and 2010 under varying economic and policy contexts.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project

Abstract

This project aims - similar to research in Denmark and Germany - to use administrative paneldata from the Belgian Social Security and Population Registers to analyse i) recent trends in order-specific fertility and ii) socio-economic differences in the combination of work and family. Results are linked to the literature and typologies of Wellfare state regimes and empirical results on differential uptake of measures.

Researcher(s)

• Promoter: Neels Karel

Research team(s)

• Centre for Population, Family and Health

Project type(s)

• Research Project